I appear to have perhaps upset someone. If I have, it was not intended. My email address is next to the Birdguides photo. If you mail me and explain, I will gladly apologise and not repeat whatever I did to cause the problem. I admit my photo is poor. But the i/d is sound, confirmed by the other birder there. Apologies, once again.
Hi anon, no upsets up here, that is never my intention, after all this is a hobby! No apologies necessary at all.
I assume its Gordon? Gordon, at least you got a photo of a bird that may help get to the real id of the bird. Everything learned is a bonus in my book. Maybe there were two birds in the area and you got the wrong one? Or maybe I have misjudged the photo ?
At the end of the day, this is all simply about opinions and discussions, there is certainly no reason to think that there are any hard feelings. Apologies from me if you have been offneded in any way.
4 comments:
That'll be the Wooler RLB well and truly dissed then?
Not for me to say Iain. I haven't seen it. But that photo is about as Rough legged as the bird you had at Denwick!
I appear to have perhaps upset someone. If I have, it was not intended. My email address is next to the Birdguides photo. If you mail me and explain, I will gladly apologise and not repeat whatever I did to cause the problem. I admit my photo is poor. But the i/d is sound, confirmed by the other birder there. Apologies, once again.
Hi anon, no upsets up here, that is never my intention, after all this is a hobby! No apologies necessary at all.
I assume its Gordon? Gordon, at least you got a photo of a bird that may help get to the real id of the bird. Everything learned is a bonus in my book. Maybe there were two birds in the area and you got the wrong one? Or maybe I have misjudged the photo ?
At the end of the day, this is all simply about opinions and discussions, there is certainly no reason to think that there are any hard feelings. Apologies from me if you have been offneded in any way.
Cheers Stewart.
Post a Comment